Gospel Parallels Essay

This is a investigate report of what I read and studied among the two paragraphs in Throckmortons Gospel Parallels Paragraph 6, The Baptism of saviour, and Paragraph 249, The Crucifixion. This report will none where the parallel Gospels differ and where they atomic number 18 similar. Additionally, you will find interpretations by me of the schoolbook critical notes and then Ill decide which reading is the better atomic number 53.The Beatitudes bring up ar the poor in spirit, for theirs is the landed estate of Heaven (Matthew 53). The Beatitudes are a group of sayings by the Nazarene that began with the words, Blessed are, and went on to differentiate who was blessed and why. It then finished with an exhortation. In this first case, the poor in spirit are those who are blessed because they will receive the demesne of Heaven. The Beatitudes can only be found in Matthew and Luke, and slice they draw many similarities, there are in any case differences. These help us to grass things about(predicate) the sources used, as well as the intention of the author.First of all, one must note that Mark was not used as a source, since the Beatitudes are not found in Mark, yet Matthew and Luke still accept many exact or plebeian phrases. The similarities point to a mutual source, which we will call Q. However, Matthew and Luke show many differences as well, meaning that they did not simply use source Q. Matthew and Luke each inserted some sort of oral examination or written tradition forrader writing their own text.many of the blessings stated in the texts are parallel between the two gospels. They both talk about the poor as well as the kingdom of Heaven. They talk about those who are hungry and how they will be filled. They withal talk about those who are hated on account of deliverer. Finally, they final stage with a command to rejoice, for those persecuted will have a great rejoin in Heaven since the uniform kind of persecution was done to the pr ophets.At the resembling time, however, Matthew and Luke clearly have different objectives or opinions regarding the text. In Matthew, the poor are the poor in spirit, while in Luke they are simply poor. Similarly, when public lecture about the hungry, Matthew is referring to those who are spiritually hungry while Luke talks about those who are physically hungry. Also, Matthews list of Beatitudes is much longer and includes public lecture about those who are merciful, pure in heart, the peacemaker, and those who are persecuted. Luke leaves these out entirely, plausibly because Luke was focusing more on the physical well-being of people.What is the reason for these differences? on that point seems to be an overarching theme that is carried out within both of these books. Matthew focuses on the deity and suffering/rejection of Jesus. This then shows up within the Beatitudes as Matthew focuses on the church property rather than physicality of the believers (poor in spirit verses simply poor), in the same way that he focuses on the divinity rather than physicality of Jesus. In addition, Jesus is portrayed as one who is rejected, which is also a common theme as Matthew talks about the rejection of the believers and how they will be given over the kingdom of Heaven.So, adept as Jesus is rejected in Matthew, so will the believers be rejected. Furthermore, it can be seen that Matthew is talking to an audience that wants to moderate all believers, not just Jews. Matthew very carefully points out that Jesus says, Blessed are those, Blessed are they, Blessed are the, which implies that Jesus is not talking to just those who were gathered at the time before Him (in contrast Blessed are you). Jesus means that anyone is blessed when they do these things.In Luke, the Beatitudes are focused more on those who are in need, a familiar theme throughout Luke. Here, Jesus is portrayed as one who is concerned for the poor, the marginalized, women, etc. Luke clearly points out in his Beatitudes that Jesus is concerned with those who are in need and gives them hope for the future, that they will be filled, receive the kingdom of Heaven, have reason to leap for joy, etc. This comes just two chapters after Jesus mission statement from Isaiah 61 as He proclaims that He has been anointed to preach good news to the poor. While Luke also wants to incorporate the gentiles into his audience, he does have Jesus saying, Blessed are you, while speaking to the Jewish crowd that had gathered around Him.This is no move since Luke wants to undertake a more concise and put-together account of Jesus ministry. It seems that he thinks it more likely that Jesus would have addressed his audience directly. It does, however, change in the last line as Jesus says for that is what their ancestors did to the prophets rather than for that is what your ancestors. . . This could mayhap be an argument for Lukes idea of the universality of the church.Both of these accounts go awa y glimpses into Jesus ministry and the heart or direction of the author, and though both break off varying accounts, it seems all the more credible since they were written to a genuine audience at a certain time.