Discrimination lawsuit. Why jury decision making emotional damages Essay

Discrimination typefaceIntroductionPresenting demo In speak to proceedings, enjoin is presented as both oral or create verbally depending on the choice of the witness. In addition, the means of giving curtilage may be meetd by the salute or the jury in charge under various considerations. both oral and written evidence have the same purpose and seat be used as the innovation of court ruling (Edwards et al., 2011). In this situation where as a human resource I get out be required to provide evidence of a discrimination lawsuit, the written method of evidence presentation leave be the most distract to answer the questions from the Jury. The method of written presentation leave behind allow up to(predicate) time to prep ar and present my part of evidence and with adequate in formations. Since the presentation of evidence requires tuition detailing the truth about the librate and the organizations position on the case and the policy that were under consideration, the written evidence would help me to consult with other legal experts and answer questions accordingly. Oral evidence would prevent consultations that might solvent in inaccurate evidence that will be used to give unfair rulings. Moreover, written evidence will save a lot of time that could have been used to present the oral presentation in the court. In addition, any inconveniences would such as absenteeism in work place and productivity of the firm will be avoided (Edwards et al., 2011). Hence, written evidence will ensure that the operations of the business are not affected in any way. Moreover, it will reduce the embody incurred during the lawsuit proceedings. Finally, written evidence presents a proof that the tuition communicated is legitimate and cannot be changes. This ensures that the evidence is not compromised since is always read and presented to court as the original copy of evidence. This is in contrast to oral presentation where evidence may be changed where one may be questioned more than erst hence compromising the evidence, which may affect the reliability of the evidence.Jury last making emotional damages The Jury would rely on information from psychiatrists and medical experts who would evaluate the damages that the plaintiff suffered as a result of discriminations. This would involve psychological and mental problems that may have arose because of the discrimination (Edwards et al., 2011). emphasise would be one of the conditions that may be evaluated and whether there were medical complications that resulted from the homophobic acts. In addition, the information about the pain suffered because of discrimination would be evaluated on medical basis. These sufferings could then be compared with any financial implications suffered. In addition, information regarding how the working and the productivity of the plaintiff was affected could be used to determine the level of the effects of emotional damages and thus form the basis of finan cial pay. For example, if in any case the discrimination resulted in rock-bottom productivity of the plaintiff, which reduced the financial income of the income would form the basis of monetary compensation decision. Moreover, it could be evaluated based on how the act affected his or her suspect day-to-day life. Similar during the proceedings, the defence presents their argument on the amount of monetary compensation that should be awarded to the plaintiff (Edwards et al., 2011). Jury determine the compensatory amount that should be paid to the plaintiff depending on the information provided by the defence team. When the court uses this information as the basis of their compensatory decision, the court act in favour of the plaintiff and it may end up awarding huge sums of money, which may be unfair to the respondent. Finally, the jury would use their freedom that is granted by the section of the law to determine the damage caused to the plaintiff and use the evidence presented t o award monetary compensation. The decision could either be based on similar cases that were ruled in the past of depending on the reasoning of the bench. speechEdwards, L., Edwards, J. S., & Wells, P. (2011). Tort Law. Cengage Learning.Source document