lucid dreaming :: essays research papers

Lucid breathing ining government agency dreaming while knowing that you be dreaming. The term was coined by Frederik cutting edge Eeden who used the word " legitimate" in the sense of mental clarity. lucidness ordinarily begins in the midst of a dream when the dreamer realizes that the get under ones skin is not occurring in physical reality, further is a dream. Often this realisation is triggered by the dreamer noticing some impossible or unlikely feature in the dream, such as flying or meeting the deceased. sometimes people become lucid without noticing any particular clue in the dream they just suddenly realize they be in a dream. A minority of lucid dreams (according to the research of LaBerge and colleagues, about 10 percent) be the result of returning to REM (dreaming) sleep directly from an awakening with continual reflective consciousness. The basic definition of lucid dreaming requires nothing more(prenominal) than becoming aware that you are dreaming . However, the quality of uncloudedness can take off greatly. When lucidity is at a high level, you are aware that everything undergo in the dream is occurring in your mind, that there is no real danger, and that you are asleep in bed and will awaken shortly. With low-level lucidity you may be aware to a certain extent that you are dreaming, perhaps enough to fly or alter what you are doing, but not enough to realize that the people are dream representations, or that you can suffer no physical damage, or that you are real in bed. 1.2 IS LUCID DREAMING THE SAME AS DREAM envision?Lucidity is not synonymous with dream take hold. It is possible to be lucid and have little control over dream content, and conversely, to have a great deal of control without being explicitly aware that you are dreaming. However, becoming lucid in a dream is likely to amplification the extent to which you can deliberately influence the course of events. Once lucid, dreamers usually choose to do someth ing permitted only by the extraordinary freedom of the dream state, such as flying. You always have the choice of how much control you want to exert. For example, you could continue with whatever you were doing when you became lucid, with the added knowledge that you are dreaming. Or you could pass judgment to change everything--the dream scene, yourself, other dream characters.

Grandpas Lap :: essays research papers

                     grandfathers Lap     She seems to be at ease. Her face was completely consumed by her smile. She was in what mat up comparable a safe place. Grandpas lick eternally felt ilk a safe place. He was her hero. He would protect her from anything and everything that may come her way. He was a brave warrior who would take on the institution for her if he had to.          He smelled of Old Spice and cheap chaving cream. It was a comfy smell. It was the kind of smell that made her want to curl up undermentioned to him. She would always watch him shave in the morning. She would often wonder wherefore she couldnt shave like Grandpa. Once he shaved half of his whiskers off. He said, "If you like me with a beard look at this side, and if you like me better without, look at the other side." He was silly like that a lot. He was always humming while he shaved. It was always a silly song she guessed. He only hummed because the words to the songs were excessively dirty for a little girls ears. He was in the shipboard soldiers after all. he didnt know any frilly songs. Only the hearty, manly, dirty songs. He would sometimes sing her a nursery rhyme when no one else was around.           Grandpa was a special man. He retired from the marines, but never retired from the lifestyle. "One green goddess take a man out of the marines, but you cant take the marine out of a man." This was one of Grandpas favorite sayings. The marine really does block in a man. It added to Grandpas loving personality. It added a feeling of security. It added a lot.          Grandpas lap was her favorite spot. The big chair wasnt the same when Grandpa couldnt turn on in it any longer. Once he was gone, no one would really sit there. He used to tickle her if she took his seat.

Animal Farm-The hunger for power Essay

The Hunger for PowerIn kindergarten, umpteen usu in ally fatality to be the line tender. For some, leadership fall downs naturally and taking fritter of things is what they like to do. For opposites, it is easier to stay in the shadows and let recoiler(a) people lead. However, this leads to problems when star person or group pirates business office and physical exertions it to ones payoff. In the novel, beast bring on, the author, George Orwell, creates a story where animals revolt and expel their neglectful thrower, husbandman Jones, from the farm. The pigs slowly stand out to form a tyranny and rule everywhere the some early(a) animals. They make up rules that public assistance the pigs alone. Two pigs that fight for office, increase and snooze, begin to use fear and role to get what they loss speckle they still stay in favor of the animals. Pretty soon, the pigs come on to involve Farmer Jones ways. They contract to become more like the humans that they accept to fear and hate at the beginning of the revolution. In the novel physical Farm, George Orwell uses the literary de evils of symbolism, foreshadowing, and metaphors to demonstrate the theme of hazards of dictatorship.There argon many symbols in Animal Farm. The novel is an allegory, or a symbolical narrative, that reflects on the problems of the dictatorships of tsar Nicholas II and Joseph Stalin. Soon after the revolution, Napoleon starts to exhaust charge oer the another(prenominal) animals. Napoleon was a large, rather fierce-looking Berkshire boarwith a paper for getting his own way (Orwell 16). Napoleon gets his own way, specificly with the serve well of the fierce dogs he raises to do exactly what he wants. This symbolizes how Stalin uses fear and intimidation, of his cryptic police, to get what he wants out of the people he rules everywhere. It also helps that Napoleon is a pig, and in the novel, the pigs atomic number 18 known to be the smartest of t he animals. Pretty soon, the pigs start to take advantage of the animals stupidity. The pigs did not actually boast, merely directed and supervised the others (Orwell 27).Here, the pigs manipulate the animals to deliberate that the pigs are in charge, because they are the smartest and the brainwork of the farm. This represents how Stalin uses his propaganda, like Napoleon uses Squealer, to persuade the people that they need to work harder for the benefit of the bracing politics because it is unafraid for everyone in the end. In reality, it is not wide-cut for everyone. In the novel, the animals hardwork benefits the pigs alone. There is evident weakness and self-conceit at the core of the pig dictatorship (Letemendia 129). V.C. Letemendia, author of Revolution on Animal Farm, describes the definite lack of unity and equality in the animals new government. Whe neer the pigs manipulate the animals and trick them to do or commend a true way, it is for the pigs own good, not the good of the whole farm. That is the weakness this author describes in his work. Dictatorship corrupts because of the vanity and voraciousness of the dictators. The pigs, as dictators of the other animals, use manipulation to benefit only themselves and their wants.The pigs redress themselves to a higher place all the other animals. They think they get special treatment and discredit the other animals even though they do all the work on the farm. The pigs counter this argument and take up they are the brainwork of the farm. The pigs start to trick the animals, and slowly, they lead them below their office staff. At first, the pigs and the other animals seem unified, alone then the equality they portray with the animals starts to rapidly diminish. As a reader, one can foreshadow things to come in the novel, especially when the pigs slowly lead the other animals under their power and dictatorship. The pigs and the animals no bimestrial seem equal as the pigs start to ma nipulate the animals to do what they want. The pigs start to take advantage of the stupidity of the other animals. They also start to championship certain privileges over the other animals, and to prove that they deserve these privileges, they use their win over pig Squealer. the milk and the windfall apples should be reserved for the pigs alone (Orwell 36). Here, the pigs solicit privileges that benefit only themselves. This predicts that the pigs become more like leaders over the other animals just like Farmer Jones. The more the pigs set themselves above the other animals, the more one can predict that the pigs power at long last assists them when they become dictators. gray-haired Major, the wise old pig, warns the animals about the possible mounting of a single power if the animals do not follow the commandments. supra all, no animal must ever tyrannise over his own kind. Weak or strong, clever or simple, we are all brothers totally animals are equal (Orwell 11). Old Majo r, who is very wise, predicts that if the animals do not come to understand that they are all equal, and they are all brothers, then they bequeath not successfully uphold their dignity and the dignity of all the animals. Old Major warns of a tyranny of one kind of animal over the other types of animals. The pigs form a dictatorship and believe they are above everyone else because they are the smartest. Even though the pigs use their power over the other animals, the animals still rely on the pigs because they are not very smart. The pigs think they need to step in and take over the role of the smartest leaders. The more and more tyrannous doings of the pigs who run the farmflawless reciprocal religion or all perish together (Ridenour 39).Louis Ridenour, author of Animal Farm is an Amusing and Alarming Novel, describes how the tyranny of the pigs who overpower the other animals increases throughout the novel. The pigs start with something small, and they take the privilege to eat any of the apples away from the other animals. Then, clean soon, the animals enter servitude under the pigs. Dictatorship corrupts because of the vanity and voraciousness of the dictators. This shows how the pigs, as dictators of the other animals, use manipulation to benefit only themselves and their wants. They start to trick the animals, and slowly, they lead them under their power. The pigs demand special privileges for themselves and they start to tyrannize over the other animals until the animals pretty much do their work for barely enough nourishment to keep them alive. Even though wise Old Major warns the pigs, they do not heed his words and instead the meaning of, All animals are equal, goes to waste when the pigs turn it around and make rules and privileges to benefit the pigs selfish wants (Orwell 11).The pigs edacity for power shows when they start to follow in the footsteps of the human, Farmer Jones, who they successfully invert in the animals revolution. The antipathetical gap between animals and humans distinctly shows in Orwells novel, especially during the revolution on animal farm. The animals enemies are the humans, and vice versa, because each group covets the other groups power. They each want that power for themselves. Both the pigs and the humans show a hunger for power and dictatorship. pigs and humans may come to look the same at the end, but they are still essentially enemies and share only a greed for power (Letemendia 133). V.C. Letemendia, author of Revolution on Animal Farm, is describing the greed and employ of power both the humans and the pigs come to have. Each are victims of greed and selfishness. They are not enemies of eachother, but rather, they are enemies of greed and want of the other groups power. Orwell depicts the hostility between the animals and humans very well. He accedes, All men are enemies.All animals are comrades (Orwell 10). The animals think that to work well together and be comrades, one has to be an animal. Animals can never be friends to humans because they are evil, and therefore an animal must unendingly consider humans as enemies. Part of the reason the animals are unpeaceful to the humans is because Farmer Jones does not treat the animals with respect, and instead he neglects his duties to take care of the animals. When his neglect goes too far, the animals rebel against him and establish themselves as the power and therefore take the responsibility of the farm. The animals, under their oppressor Farmer Jones, are broken and want to end their hardships. After the revolution, they simply go back to their grim ways when the pigs form a dictatorship and become the animals new oppressors. No animal in England is free. The life of an animal is misery and slavery that is the unmixed truth (Orwell 7). Orwell compares the lives of the animals with the misery and slavery they are forced to endure under their many oppressors who are Jones and the pigs. The animals never know freedom because of the constant dictatorship of their many oppressors, humans and animals. The animals think their enemies are only Jones and all humans, when in reality, their true enemies are the dictators that rule over them and the greed those dictators have for power.The animals lives rest of fear for themselves, and of course, fear of the slavery they must endure. Constantly they endure many toils and hardships under their irresponsible oppressors. The animals, under their cruel dictators, do not interpret their lives will be better if Jones becomes their owner again. They are very confounded because of the persuading words of the pigs, that they do not even remember when Jones became their owner. George Orwell, author of Animal Farm, uses the literary devices of symbolism, foreshadowing, and metaphors to present the theme of hazards of dictatorship. The pigs symbolize dictators, such as Joseph Stalin, who use their power to benefit only themselves and their want s. Just like Stalin and other dictators, the pigs set themselves above all the other animals. Pretty soon, the pigs start to take advantage of their intelligence, and the animals stupidity. They use fear and manipulation to achieve the power that they want. This represents how Stalin uses his propaganda to persuade the people that they need to work harder for the benefit of the new government because it is good for everyone in the end. When a dictatorship occurs, the ones of lesser importance or the ones with less power are not treated with respect or dignity.They are cheated, their rights are abused, and their oppressors use manipulation to remain with power. The pigs demand special privileges for themselves and they start to tyrannize over the other animals. One can create the pigs hunger for power when they start to follow the ways of Farmer Jones, who they want to successfully overthrow in the animals revolution. The hostility between the animals and humans clearly shows in Orwells novel, especially during the revolution. The animals, at the start of the novel, are hostile to Farmer Jones and his power over them. The animals, under their oppressor Farmer Jones, are lamentable and want to end their hardships. They think they are better off without the dictatorship of their master. After the revolution, the animals simply go back to their miserable ways when the pigs form a dictatorship and become the animals new oppressors. In Animal Farm, Orwell believes that all revolutions come to fail. When a revolution occurs, the original power is overthrown, and maybe for a while, the group as a whole work together for the good of everyone. Then, as every group with a goal must have a leader, dictatorship is established and the group falls back into the state of oppression once more.

Animal Farm: Depicts the Views of Communist Society

Animal make The views of communism are not real common today simply because of how impractical they are. The human nature to cook hierarchy is a direct contradiction to the views of communist society. Animal Farm is George Orwells comment on communism in the form of a satire where the animals on a parent rebel against the farmer and enchant control. From the first stirring of rebellion, there are resolutions to keep all animals equal.However, the farm soon went from a utopia to something far from perfect as the pigs slowly translate reigned over the other animals. The pigs completely corrupt superannuated Majors vision of Animalism by taking special privileges, changing the commandments, and exploiting the animals. At the start of Manor Farms transition to animal farm, the pigs rescript Old Majors idea of Animalism and Squealer is agonistic to change the Commandments to fit new circumstances. The first alteration to the Commandments comes after the pigs live on into the Mr. Jones farmhouse. A few animals remember something in the commandment specifically on put outs, but cannot muster much because of their inferior intelligence. The ban on quiescence in beds is changed in Napoleons favor by the addition of the words with sheets to the quarter commandment (No animal shall peacefulness in a bed. These suspicions are further forgotten as Squealer assures the other animals that the pigs sleep in beds with blankets, and have gotten rid of the sheets.In addition, the pigs start to drink alcohol. When Napoleon gets drunk, some(prenominal) animals are alarmed and shocked, but all that ultimately happens is that the words to surplusage are added to the fifth commandment (No animal shall drink alcohol). It is evident that Old Majors speech was in vain as the pigs give the sack the old pigs warnings and start to attain human traits. on that point is no subtle change to the third or first Commandments near wearing clothes and walking on deuce legs.This is because by the beat the pigs start to put on clothes and walk on two legs, they are so powerful that it is unnecessary. Instead, all of the unalterable laws are given over and Old Majors inspiring commandments are replaced by the slogan- every(prenominal) animals are equal, but some are more equal than others. The pigs changes to the sea captain views of Animalism causes them to take control and essentially put the farm put up into its previous condition before the rebellion.The sole difference was the control of husbandman Jones, and that of our Leader, Comrade Napoleon. George Orwell uses Anima Farm to portray the pitfall of a undemocratic society. Orwell shows his opposition by creating a novel with animals representing different people in the world. The authors message is a warning of what comes with communistic governments and dictatorships. The pigs and animals on the farm are simply an allusion to the communist societies in the world today.

Critique on John Holt’s Artitlce, Right to Ones Own Learning Essay

John Holt (1923-1985) was a ren beargond t apieceer and a debat equal procreational figure who advocated the coach reform. His analysis on the image of homeschooling from diverse military positions brooks a deeper insight on the beneficial aspects of this idea. It was because of the persuading appeal of his work that it became ane of the forces behind the homeschooling movements of 70s and 80s. After graduating from his university he served the US Navy for 3 years and after concluding his concern hug drug he became a part of the UWF( United World Federalists).Starting from the mailroom, he was able to set his mark at the executive director set after 6 years but resigned because of the ineffectiveness of the company. It was after this bill when he was unremittingly urged by his sister to put his efforts into teaching. Being touch by hundreds of young minds, he was able to analyze the bugs in the world(a) genteelness clay that eats up the potential of the disciples.Ho lts exceptional whole works , Escape from childhood The needs and rights of children, How children learn and How children fail, were a reflection of his determined belief in the idea of homeschooling. His article in the Nature nestling Project emulates the same believes. In his article John Holt has been able to rock the ratifiers about the beneficial aspects of the opinion of homeschooling tour giving a tiny valuation of the constitutional flaws of the popular rearing system and the necessary enjoyment of the fosters in enhancing the potential of their kid.However the writer loses the interest of the readers with his biased smell on the complex form part of the world(a) education system where he has attempt to persuade the audience with an emotional impact instead of presenting a lawful reasoning to uphold his deeds, makes the audience question the credibility of the text. The compulsory frequent education system in the constitution does non only segmentatio n the developing potential of the kids but also takes a means their right of wonder factor which gives them the freedom to learn and explore.Giving full liberty of cream does not mean that the parents opinion loses its worth, but, their efforts should be to provide an organize path focusing to their kids so that they pile lead the way with their own choices with a better perspective. Further he sheds light on the expression of the education system which exploits the honourable and emotional values of every iodine involved. The necessity of do to survive amongst the immense competition leads to each person, whether the student or the spot itself, dragging rase others to get at the top.The writer carries a compelling approach to attract and convince the audience, portraying an advantageous image of homeschooling. With his constant attack on the universal education methodology from fundamental perspective and his comments on the immoral viruses induced in the students by the structure of this education system, he is trying to cotton up the audience with the necessity of homeschooling.An idea which carries a more widened approach towards learning and boosting the potential skills of the students, tutelage them safe of the brotherly isolation and the unethical morals on which the universal education system works. Highlighting the concept of universal education and the plys pertain to it, the writer has change down the subject to those countries which works on this system. Though his approach to highlight the psychological aspect and the bailiwick concerned to the organic evolution of neighborly and ethical practices of a student are shared by all(a).So whilst keeping under banter the bugs of the Amerifanny Universal Education system, he has broadened the discussion to a globalised audience and highlighted the issues faced by all encompassing. Holt has disposed an organized structure to the content of the text. Starting with an explanation of th e subject matter, he has prosecute the audience to the topic under discussion and then he has pinned down the questions of the audience concerned to the topic by giving legitimate facts to livelihood his claims.After which he gives an insight to the flaws of the universal education system which barely supports his stand on the subject matter. He has tried explaining each issue using a popular style of writing, so that the text rout out be enjoyed by a broader audience and they can develop a clear sympathy of the subject matter in the text. The uniform inflection of the text has made it easier for the audience to link the following point to the one before it, and develop a clear understanding of the issues highlighted as each point being discussed is clarifying the point discussed before it.With his utter focalize on the topic, he has not distracted from the main issue on a single instance. This helps the audience to develop a clear understanding of the issues he has put forth. Carrying a serious, straightforward woodland and his mastery oer ridicule he has been able to depict the true image of the universal education system . His use of sarcasm on various instances in the article plays a pivotal role in helping the reader identify the reality juxtaposed against the false picture of universal education portrayed by the governing.For example when he states , They thought it was adequate to plight citizens the freedom of speech and the freedom to spread their ideas.. it did not occur to them that nevertheless the most tyrannical government would try to control peoples mind( Holt 1) This captures the interest of the readers and explains the fundamental issue of constitutional flaw concerned to education policy , which is designed in much(prenominal) a way that it restricts the freedom of thought and learning of the kid.On another instance he states, It only means that if their natural authority is not strong enough parents cant call in the cops to mak e the child do what they are not able to persuade him to do. (Holt 2) Here he effectively conveys his disapproval of the hardships that the kid has to face if he/she resists the structured plan of the authorities, with that edifying the necessity of the positive(p) solvent of the parents in shaping their childs potential.It is the attitude they carry towards their childs potential and his field of interest, that they can either make their child or break their child. Along with sarcasm the writer makes effective use of a serious and straightforward tone to convey his thoughts on the significance of the fundamental rights which are snatched away from the students by the constitution itself , saying, No human right except the right to heart itself is more fundamental than this. (Holt 1) Further to illuminate the reader about the unethical values that are induced in us by the structure of the educational system the writer says, In most schools, a student is every minute doing wha t others tell him, subject to their judgment, in situations in which he can only win at the expense of the others. (Holt 3) On this mathematical function he evokes the threat to ethical and emotional values of the student body that the educational system imposes.Having said that, the writer loses the credibility of his work when he starts generalizing his opinion on a few cases and making biased assumptions while commenting on the parenting concerned questions elevated by the people, when he states, the questioner assumes and implies (though rarely says) that these bad parents are people shortsighteder and less schooled than him. ( Holt 2) He has narrowed his response to incisively the poor without even being sure whether the question implies to the poor or it may be applicable to everyone.He makes strong allegations against the education system when he claims , schools seem to me among the most democratic, most authoritarian, most baneful and most dangerous institutions of the modern society. (Holt 3) The absence of logical explanation to support such allegations makes the audience believe the writer is trying to put tincture on the neediness of weight in his claims, by using an extra emotional impact. Despite his biased assumptions and the fact that the writer has not been able to provide a logical reasoning while stating his views concerned to the accessible and unethical impact of the education system.His detailed explanations and a series of verifiable analysis of his facts on the issues concerned to the fundamental perspective and necessity of parents role is commendable and many can restore to it. thence in this context the writer has been able to attract the readers to his opinion, as the credibility of the text carries a greater weight compared to its flaws. Although Pakistani society does not share the universal education concept, the issues brought forth by Holt concerning to academic, ethical and social development are shared by glob al student body.Questions concerning the tariff of parents on this subject, the exploitation of ethics and freedom of learning by the authorities has become a concern for people students of Pakistani society too. The way the education system is shaped restricts the students to follow a structured plan, against their wills, to go in the society. Lack of vulnerability to versatile fields of work has cancelled the students in to robots who are manufactured for a specific function and are dumped if not workable.A student with a sheer creative genius would be forced to become an engineer to fit in because of the lack of choices and resources to enhance his skills. As John Holt sheds light on the substantial duty of the parents concerned to their child , it cannot be ignored that parents are burdened with a certain responsibility to provide their child with the ideal resources, preparing them to tackle the hardships of a practical life. John Holt on the other hand was never matrimon ial nor had any children. He does not share this concern and might not be able to get an insight on their perspective.Though his claim, that the positive attitude of the parents can boost their childs potential, is supported by the quoted work of educational expertise in Chris Klickas article , Socialization crime syndicateschoolers are in the real world. Dr Larry Shyers after doing an empirical analysis on the subject matters concluded , home-schooled children behave better because they slant to imitate their parents (Klicka 1) Questions are increase regarding the socializing skills and maturity of the homeschooled students.The Psychological tests and their evaluation by the authorities in Chris Klickas article, Socialization homeschoolers are in real world, speak a different language on this concept. The widened exposure to the people of different age group and distinctive backgrounds enhances their communication skills. This concept was authorized by a respected psychologist , John Wesley Taylor. He time-tested the social skills of 224 children and summed up the experimental response stating , The study found that 50 percent of the children scored above the 90th percentile, and only 10. percent scored below the discipline average. (Klicka 1)Smedley, an authority in the field of psychology, doing an experimental evaluation on this issue concluded , the results demonstrated that the home-schooled children were better socialized and more mature than the children in the public school. The home-schooled children scored in the 84th percentile while the matched sample of public school children only scored in the 27th percentile. (klicka 1)This study further answers the concerning questions of the audience relating to the development and learning skills.With a liberty to pursue the work which they want to, homeschooled holds a more focused perspective which enhances their learning. They tend to perform better than the students of the universal education sys tem, on the SATs and other tests which evaluates the learning skills of the students. Chris Klicka, older Counsel for the Home School Legal Defense Association, states in his article, Home school families, as a whole, do not raise their children in social isolation. ( Klicka 1) which provides a supporting base to Holts claim on the social isolation faced by the students of the education system.Even with all logical evidence and legitimate explanation supporting Holts claim this ideology cannot be generalized to everyone. There are kids who would prefer to go to the school and enjoy an exposure to that environment willfully. many an(prenominal) scholars agree that cognitive development should not be pushed and that uniformity is provided by the organized educational system, which has reformed some of its structures to deal with the bugs that Holts has stated. The transition in the educational structure to tackle the bugs of the educational system is pretty evident .The flawlessnes s of the vast curriculum and academic facilities provided by the educational centers which induces an atmosphere of healthy competition and helps in shaping the potential skills of the students providing them with a better perspective. The concerns raised by John Holt about the education system are well-grounded and there is no doubt that many people can relate to them, but, this should not let the audience ignore the voice of those who contradict with his views. Many scholars agree that the educational system should be reformed in such a way that these two contradicting views are imbued together.The education system is in sheer need of reformation and still has to deal with most of the concerns raised by John Holt, but, that does not mean students should not be given an exposure to this experience. As years have passed the platform to perform and act with people of diverse backgrounds, provided by the educational institutes, has broadened. In conclusion, this would not just help in giving a reformed structure to the concept of learning but when exposed to the positive aspects of both the structures student can enjoy the perks of both.

Pre-Columbian History of the Caribbean Indigenous People Essay

Both natal groups, Tainos and Siboneys migrated to the Caribbean region. The first indigenous group to migrate to the Caribbean was the Siboneys. Although their origin has been debated, the common perception is that they came from either the gray top of modern day Florida or Mexico. It is estimated that more or less 500 B. C. they colonized in the Greater Antilles region of the Caribbean. This region includes the Bahamas, Cuba and Jamaica. The Taino migration occurred nearly around the selfsame(prenominal) time as the Siboneys.Their migration started from the South American mainland, most notably the celestial sphere between Venezuela and Colombia to the area known as the Lesser Antilles of the Caribbean. This area include islands such as Trinidad and the Virgin Islands. The Taino utilized canoes to travel between separately island during their migration. The canoes were made out of tree trunks and measured approximately 25 meters in length. Each canoe had a travel capacity of approximately 50 concourse. The main reason for the Taino migration was increased agitation and threats from the Carib indigenous people from the same region in South America.The Caribs were fierce in the their pursual of the Taino and followed them up into the Lesser Antilles. Culturally, two the Taino and Siboney differed greatly. The Siboneys communed in small societies. Some would repugn that they were culturally unsophisticated. They did not make any complex tools, just wood, pitfall and shells. The Siboneys also settled by the riverside since they did not design any form of agriculture. Their diet consisted of easily attainable animals such as fish and reptiles. They also ate wild fruits that were native to the islands.Conversely, the Taino were more forward-looking than their northern neighbor the Siboneys. The Taino had a complex society that consisted of settlements of as a lot as 500 inhabitants. They also contained a social structure for severally settlement tha t consisted of a chief known as a cacique, a tier of elders who represented various families of each settlement, women and minorren. The Taino designated tasks to its members according to their position. Men percipient uninhabited areas of land and fished. Women were in charge of crop cultivation and child rearing.Unlike the Siboneys, the Taino mastered the art of farming. They farmed various crops such as yucca, guava and sweet potatoes. They also hunted various small grainy around the islands. The Taino also mastered clay pottery. Lastly, the Taino exercised their religious beliefs regularly. They believed in Gods that they called Zemis. The Caiciques crinkle was to carry out religious ceremonies by nasally ingesting a psychotropic mixture of tobacco and crushed sea shells through a foresightful pipe called a cohoba. This snuff allowed the caciques to communicate with their Gods.Unlike the Siboneys, the Taino were a highly advanced society. They played a sophisticated team game called Batey. This game can be considered as the precursor to modern day soccer. specially designed ball courts were created for Batey. In addition, The Taino also created jewelry and ornaments in which twain men and women wore to Festivals and other celebratory events. In conclusion, the Taino and Siboney indigenous people both migrated to the Caribbean region. They both make up the genealogical and cultural starting layer for all individuals who hail from the Caribbean region.

Federal government of the United States Essay

1. Based on your aver research on industrial/ mercantile and government purchasing, what are those elements that you consider to be unique to each?The divergency is the two is the government has certain part and rights that commercial enterprises do not have in my opinion. The government is not in the business in making a profit. There are certain price limits strike off by the government that can not be exceeded majority of the generation when making purchases. In Federal Government contracting, specific regulatory authority is required for the Governments agent to enter into the contract, and that agents bargaining authority is strictly controlled by statutes and regulations reflecting National policy choices and prudent limitations on the right of Federal employees to obligate Federal funds. Commercial purchases on the other hand , is mainly guided by profit motivations. individually commercial/private trafficker represents itself and can obligate their purchases in its ow n manner.2. What are the skill sets that a purchasing and supply precaution skipper should possess or acquire to be successful in the example of the purchasing functions with commercial or Governmental organizations?The skill set that a purchasing, and supply management professional, should possess or acquire successful is, relationship/team building skills. The ability to deal with a client /vendor or manufacture and come to terms and or agreement, that will take in both parties. I also think you should have some foregoing experience 2-4 years in purchasing or supply management . Lastly, holding a degree in business management, contract serve or acquisition management should also be a essential skill.

Analyze the change and continuities in commerce along the Indian Ocean from 650 to1750 C.E. Pgs

Analyze the change and continuities in traffic along the Indian naval from 650 to1750 C. E. Pgs. Across the Indian sea and the southerly mainland China Sea, from 650- 1750 C. E. , theIndian Ocean mint had many changes and continuities. Economically, the IndianOcean trade stayed the same with its extend of goods from virtuoso outer space to another, but changed because of the ways goods were traded along this trade route. Culturally,the Indian Ocean trade stayed the same because of the same continuous spread of righteousness and ideas, and changed because of the diffusion of thereligions alreadydominant in places.Politically, the Indian Ocean trade stayed the same in the sensethat it flourished speckle downstairs the control of strong Analyze the change and continuities in commerce along the Indian Ocean from 650 to1750 C. E. Pgs. Across the Indian Ocean and the South China Sea, from 650- 1750 C. E. , theIndian Ocean trade had many changes and continuities. Economically, the IndianOcean trade stayed the same with its spread of goods from one place to another, but changed because of the ways goods were traded along this trade route.Culturally,the Indian Ocean trade stayed the same because of the same continuous spread of religion and ideas, and changed because of the diffusion of thereligions alreadydominant in places. Politically, the Indian Ocean trade stayed the same in the sensethat it flourished while under the control of strong Analyze the change and continuities in commerce along the Indian Ocean from 650 to1750 C. E. Pgs. Across the Indian Ocean and the South China Sea, from 650- 1750 C. E. , theIndian Ocean trade had many changes and continuities.Economically, the IndianOcean trade stayed the same with its spread of goods from one place to another, but changed because of the ways goods were traded along this trade route. Culturally,the Indian Ocean trade stayed the same because of the same continuous spread of religion and ideas, and changed be cause of the diffusion of thereligions alreadydominant in places.

Violent Video Games Are Harmful to Young People

ruby goggle box games can definitely be prejudicious to four-year-old good deal, oddly very greenish, easily influenced children. Maybe they dont affect severall(a)y child the same, alone Im sure that there be times when they negatively affect the life of an adolescent. I would imagine that any one exposed to violence like some Ive seen on some video games, would pick up the behavior subconsciously oer time, even if they dont consciously act violent. Sometimes young people who play games like these sort of separate themselves from reality, which leads to angry behavior.Other times, it leads bang-up to violence because thats what these kids know and experience daily on the video screen. Everyone has hear the controversy surrounding the hugely popular Grand stealth Auto games. In which, young people steal cars and kill people for absolutely no reason. I see this as a entire interpreter. I wonder how often kids spend time playing this game, or others similar to it, an d suddenly start acting out violently as a result. I believe that young people dont always necessarily make the maturity to realize that video games argonnt real.Its at these young ages that our lives are shaped, and we learn by example to become well rounded adults. If kids are constantly observing violence, accordingly as they age they are sure to act violently or at least harbor a great deal of irritability into adulthood. While I havent seen this happen first hand, Im sure that this type of thing happens all the time with young people who play violent video games all the time. Doubt I seriously have to wonder if violent video games are harmful to young people.It seems like blaming video games is the most pleasant way for parents to evacuate taking the responsibility for raising a violent kid. Its dependable like how so often people blame kids bad behavior on music or television shows. Ive watched violent movies, heard violent music, even played violent video games, but I do nt run around killing people or robbing liquor stores. Does that mean that the games I played werent violent sufficient to affect me? If these games are so harmful to young people, then how did I avoid these harmful side effects of them?Furthermore, if violent video games have the potential to turn sweet little children into murderers, then why does our regime allow them to be sold all over our country? To me it sounds atrociously familiar to the concept that rock n roll taught children to be ludicrous and rambunctious. Then theres the claim that rap music makes kids abhor women and sell drugs. Young people might be easily influenced, but they arent stupid. It all boils down to how they were raised. I think that violent adults are most likely the result of parents who didnt do their jobs correctly when their children were young.I mean, bring in young people some credit, most of them turn out all right, despite the things they are exposed to on a daily basis. assume that viole nt video games makes every kid violent is like believe that every young person that observes a person smoking a cigarette is going to pick up the habit. Just because kids are young that doesnt mean that they dont have the brain to require how they act. I know plenty of people who love violent video games, and who are not violent people. Therefore, its wrong to claim that violent video games are harmful to all young people.

How Television Shapes Our Mind Essay

The tv set has displaced instruction and thus inhibits the growth of edition skills. Watching TV requires less mental thrust than culture. Television makes things tangible, spot reading demands symbolic representation of language. While television maximizes the use of saliency(b compensate colors, audible noise, zoom) that appeals more than to the right-brain hemisphere, reading depends on the understanding of syntax and the relatively slower, successive processing of information-the of the left-hemisphere.There is an alarming increase in cases of dyslexia-the inability to read. interpretation is a laborious task compared to notice TV. Recognizing the differences in letters, combining to words, distinguishing the order, collaring the sentence, connecting to the adjacent one etc. If a kid is raised on a TV diet, who finds reading or schooling attractive? Children who never subscribe to process language without pictures attached will have difficulty in school. Furthermor e, writing ability correlates positively with the number of books read.TV backwash diminishes the quality of clever output (Source Philippine Daily Inquirer May 21, 2000)Questions based on the above paragraphs must have been formulated in mind after(prenominal) the survey. Write your questions that vary as to 5 Ws and H. The premier sample question is already provided.1. What two ideas are contrasted in the runner paragraph?2. How does television displace the reading and communication skills?3. What are the payoff and disadvantage of television in reading and communications skills?4. Why reading is become a laborious task compared to observance TV?5. How watching TV requires less mental effort than reading?6. Why television viewing diminishes the quality of intellect output?Read the two excerpts at a time completely, and highlight key ideas. Write below five important concepts in the left column then, describe each briefly in the right column.Highlighted IdeasBrief descript ion1. TV makes things tangible while reading.Through television we dejection easily see things we want to know while reading needs deep understanding on what we are reading to comprehend it.2. Reading is a laborious.When we read, it requires time and effort to understand it compared when we are watching, it is user-friendly to understand because we can visualize the idea.3. TV viewing diminishes the quality of intellectual output. It means that by TV viewing it decreases the quality of learning and skills to be developed. In addition it weakens the mental abilities of a person to continue on the quest of learning.4. Writing ability correlates positively with the number of books read. As unyielding as the person understand what he is reading he can come up on writing a purposeful mo that will benefit readers5. Watching TV requires less mental effort than readingIt is a mere fact because the aid of TV viewing it provides definite description of the characters and other things by i ts feature, color, dynamic, audio-associated and the like, thus it results on failure to explore and strengthen the true essence of learning.6. An alarming increase in cases of dyslexia-the inability to read. Children who expose more on learning through watching TV had difficulties in oral and reading communication because they are more known with visual presentation.

Being Organized

ing Natacha Petit-frere Professor Donigan December 1, 2011 Being Organized galore(postnominal) of us atomic number 18 incompatible of being organized. Organization is a adroitness that must be learned and practice by an individual. Its a rare person among us who doesnt feel the need to involve more organized. I consider myself fairly organized I award my organization skills by coordinate my c weedhes by style, color mark sections for my college courses, having a sheet of paper, a calendar and a sporty board.A lot of us always just throw our clothes in the mechanical press and its always out of order. Especially when knee pants, shirts and dresses are anywhere. On the other hand, we befoolt know exactly where they slew be found. This can be terrible when we know what we want to put on but cant find it. In my closet I father my habit in coordinating order. I put jackets in the front and pants in the back. The type of color style I use is darks in front and lights in back. Having this type of organization in my closet is in truth helpful.Im a visual person, and I find that color- mark sections for my college courses minimizes the time I have to spend looking for them. This works especially well plot of land Im in line. I dumped any class broadcast into a green folder call outed class syllabus, and then color-coded every class period blue for paper due, yellow for quiz, red for test, etc. It took for a while to set up, sure, but for the rest of the semester I only had to glance at class syllabus to get a very clear caprice of what kind of week I was going to have.Thinking if I didnt have this type of organization for school I would be kind of underscore out. When Im not in school Ill be using color-coding for work assignments also. Ive found that the easiest way to organize days, myself and so forth is a good paper calendar, a sheet of paper that I divide into four sections and a medium sized white board. For my paper the top left section is my actual running to do list for today. The top right section is my running grocery list, or list of things I must purchase.The bottom left is for notes such as calls I made, individuals I spoke to, and appointment dates. The bottom right is whatever I need to move to another day. If Im told to call back on Monday, then I note that on the calendar. As for the white board, my family can make notes. Can I borrow close to money on Friday? , Grandma called, and I also jot master things that I feel are important to them. My calendar, and the white board are in the same location, so I can transfer brief notes if need be.I carry my paper task list with me everywhere, so I can make notes at any given moment. Finally, Whatever electronics or paper you use, make them work for you not the other way around. Does coordinating our clothes really have to stay in color coding order or using a sheet of paper every 5 minutes? Maybe, but I bet youll get a whole lot more done if you check it a hardl y a(prenominal) times per day. That goes for the Blackberry too After all, there are so many tools, and one to fit everyone and thats why Im happy with the organizational system I use.